"The court should take judicial notice of the prior sworn testimony by plaintiff as permitted by Arizona case law that previously cited and has not been challenged by defendant.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this day 18th day of March, 2010" RISNER & GRAHAM"
Below are hyperlinks to motions filed in this case no. C20088876.
The two newest motions came in later Friday the 19th and I call them the Huckelberry’s Hail Mary passes.
03/19/10 New Defendant PIMA REPUBLICAN PARTY Notice of Objection to Request for Access to Ballot Containers .pdf
03/19/10 New Defendant RTA ATTORNEY Notice of Limited Appearance and Request to Appear .pdf
03/18/10 Plaintiff Reply To Objection to Request for Judicial Notice .pdf
03/17/10 Defendants Objection to Request for Judicial Notice .pdf
03/16/10 Plaintiff Response to Motion to Quash Subpoena .pdf
03/12/10 Plaintiff Request for Judicial Notice Part A .pdf03/12/10 Plaintiff Request for Judicial Notice Part B Day 3 of Bench Trial of Dec 6, 2007.pdf02/23/10 Defendant Pima Co Reply to Plaintiff Statement of Issues of Public Records .pdf02/08/10 Plaintiff Statement of Issues Concerning Retrieval & Copying Public Records .pdfOther links:01/27/10 Press Release Bill Risner, AZ Democratic Party Pass Resolution on Solutions .pdf01/23/10 Risner Resolution to ADP State Meeting – Electronic Voting- Problems and Solutions .pdf10/09/09 Significant Discrepancies in Comparison of RTA hand count Results by AZ AG. Pdf07/04/09 The PEW Report Names AZ No 1 in the use of Provisional Ballots .pdf